Posted on 

 by 

 in , ,

The Future Of News – Peak Journalism

"Society doesn't need newspapers. What we need is journalism." Clay Shirky

According to PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Global Entertainment and Media Outlook (2010 to 2014) another milestone is about to be passed with the internet poised to overtake newspapers as the second-largest U.S. advertising medium by revenue behind television. Contrast that with some bleak but revealing figures from the OECD report on The Evolution Of News And The Internet, which tells us that since 2007 the UK has seen one of the heaviest global newspaper circulation declines at 25%, second only to the US at 30%.

The growth of the global newspaper market, says the report, slowed progressively from 2004 to almost nothing in 2007 and then contracted from 2008 in spite of growth in the developing world. Taking account of non-OECD countries and the positive effects of the economic recovery, the case for the ‘death of the newspaper’ is not supported by the data, but the challenge faced by newspaper publishers is put into sharp focus by the conclusion that whilst internet traffic to online news sites has grown rapidly, the online revenues of newspapers were in general “miniscule in comparison to total revenues and online revenues of other digital content industries”, with online advertising accounting for 4% of total revenues in 2009.

The crux of the issue for publishers is that despite building large online audiences, for every online user they derive a fraction of the revenue than is made for every reader of a print newspaper. A big challenge when the share of people who only read news online is likely to show rapid growth, leading to a “real concern is that a significant proportion of young people are not reading conventional news at all”.

But whilst the report concludes that publishers have yet to discover the business model that can finance in-depth independent news production (accepting Shirky's argument that this often means a fight to preserve the old forms of organization in a world of cheap perfect copies), it’s a shame that it doesn’t make more of the experimentation-at-scale that is taking place in the news industry. Not least the wholly divergent strategies exemplified by the News Corp closed paywall and The Guardian Open Platform, the latter of which is leading to some interesting formatting experiments with news content by outside developers using the Guardian’s Content API. Meanwhile the New York Times is building a public beta testing site to allow it to experiment in public with new ideas and applications before deciding whether they deserve to go live on the main site.

  The Guardian Open Platform

The OECD report is keen to highlight the important role that news creation and distribution plays in democratic societies. Its evolution, it says, is a matter of public interest. So, I would argue, is the outcome of the strategies that are being played out right now.

Reading reports like this, and particularly about employment losses in the newspaper industry, makes me wonder whether (as Russell once speculated about advertising), whilst we have undoubtedly yet to see the high point in the volume of news produced and consumed on a daily basis, we may have reached what you might call 'Peak Journalism' – that is the point in time that has seen the maximum output produced by professional journalists – those that get paid a salary to do what we used to know as traditional journalism. I'm inclined to agree with the sentiment expressed in this excellent piece by Martin Moore, that the future of news is not so bleak, but it is not so rosy either. 

An abridged version of this post is also up on The Wall blog.

10 responses to “The Future Of News – Peak Journalism”

  1. Ian Fitzpatrick Avatar
    Ian Fitzpatrick

    Excellent piece, per usual, Neil. I agree with the broad suggestion that we’ve likely witnessed the peak output of traditional journalistic content.
    Among the many reasons that this issue is so murky is the fact that it directly positions an evolving marketplace for original content in direct conflict with organized labor – structured to protect the very kinds of jobs that Shirky labels old forms of organization. Indeed, the great balance of jobs at traditional papers in the US are charged with printing and distributing the news, not with creating it. Further, the staunch defense of existing roles precludes those occupying them from being trained in (and porting existing institutional knowledge to) new methods of content delivery.

  2. Ian Fitzpatrick Avatar
    Ian Fitzpatrick

    Excellent piece, per usual, Neil. I agree with the broad suggestion that we’ve likely witnessed the peak output of traditional journalistic content.
    Among the many reasons that this issue is so murky is the fact that it directly positions an evolving marketplace for original content in direct conflict with organized labor – structured to protect the very kinds of jobs that Shirky labels old forms of organization. Indeed, the great balance of jobs at traditional papers in the US are charged with printing and distributing the news, not with creating it. Further, the staunch defense of existing roles precludes those occupying them from being trained in (and porting existing institutional knowledge to) new methods of content delivery.

  3. David Hepworth Avatar
    David Hepworth

    In the face of the chilling stat that online advertising accounts for only 4% of newspaper revenues all the talk of new models is Panglossian optimism. (If Pangloss were around today he’d be consulting all over the place while there are still a few people desperate to believe.) The current situation is made even more misleading by the fact that our Google results are dominated by traditionally generated news from traditional sources, put there when traditional media owners still believed that 4% might be more like 40%. Since it won’t it seems reasonable to assume that the Peak Journalism this paid for won’t last very long and we’ll soon be looking back on the current situation as the vanished land of lost content.

  4. David Hepworth Avatar
    David Hepworth

    In the face of the chilling stat that online advertising accounts for only 4% of newspaper revenues all the talk of new models is Panglossian optimism. (If Pangloss were around today he’d be consulting all over the place while there are still a few people desperate to believe.) The current situation is made even more misleading by the fact that our Google results are dominated by traditionally generated news from traditional sources, put there when traditional media owners still believed that 4% might be more like 40%. Since it won’t it seems reasonable to assume that the Peak Journalism this paid for won’t last very long and we’ll soon be looking back on the current situation as the vanished land of lost content.

  5. neilperkin Avatar
    neilperkin

    @Ian. Interesting point.
    @David Thanks for stopping by. I’ll admit I had to look up who Pangloss was but I agree. Although my belief is that the 4% figure isn’t universally reflective (ie. some individual publishers are doing a LOT better than that), it nonetheless puts into the sharp relief the scale of the challenge.

  6. neilperkin Avatar
    neilperkin

    @Ian. Interesting point.
    @David Thanks for stopping by. I’ll admit I had to look up who Pangloss was but I agree. Although my belief is that the 4% figure isn’t universally reflective (ie. some individual publishers are doing a LOT better than that), it nonetheless puts into the sharp relief the scale of the challenge.

  7. Dan Thornton Avatar
    Dan Thornton

    Part of the challenge is also the lag inherent in dealing with advertisers and advertising agencies.
    One way to increase the commercial revenue is to increase the targetting and relevancy, and opening up more usage of the in-depth data that you can acquire – but so many advertisers will turn down those options to just get the maximum scale and reach for the lowest cost.
    The other point is that the print industry as a whole spent years giving away digital as a freebie for added value to protect their print business – and now they’re trying to persuade advertisers to pay a premium for something that everyone is accustomed to getting as a free bonus. Unsurprisingly, that doesn’t always go down very well.
    I do wonder whether we actually need to be concerned about people reading ‘conventional news’ – I’d love to know how this has been defined in this context, to see whether it’s a worry that people won’t know about local and world news, or just whether they’ll get it from TV, radio, blogs, social networks and other sources. Pure digital text content has been able to work for several businesses, and there’s no reason to believe that these models won’t continue to expand (e.g. Techcrunch, Mashable, the Huff Post etc etc)

  8. Dan Thornton Avatar
    Dan Thornton

    Part of the challenge is also the lag inherent in dealing with advertisers and advertising agencies.
    One way to increase the commercial revenue is to increase the targetting and relevancy, and opening up more usage of the in-depth data that you can acquire – but so many advertisers will turn down those options to just get the maximum scale and reach for the lowest cost.
    The other point is that the print industry as a whole spent years giving away digital as a freebie for added value to protect their print business – and now they’re trying to persuade advertisers to pay a premium for something that everyone is accustomed to getting as a free bonus. Unsurprisingly, that doesn’t always go down very well.
    I do wonder whether we actually need to be concerned about people reading ‘conventional news’ – I’d love to know how this has been defined in this context, to see whether it’s a worry that people won’t know about local and world news, or just whether they’ll get it from TV, radio, blogs, social networks and other sources. Pure digital text content has been able to work for several businesses, and there’s no reason to believe that these models won’t continue to expand (e.g. Techcrunch, Mashable, the Huff Post etc etc)

  9. Air Jordan Shoes Avatar
    Air Jordan Shoes

    You have to believe in yourself. That’s the secret of success.

  10. Air Jordan Shoes Avatar
    Air Jordan Shoes

    You have to believe in yourself. That’s the secret of success.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Only Dead Fish

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading