Posted on 

 by 

 in 

The Future of Search?

Open

Because Google is so good at what it does – retrieving whatever information we want from the organisational chaos of the internet whilst involving it’s audience in the development of new tools and products – it’s tempting to think of it as an inclusive, open service. But of-course like Yahoo and Microsoft, the crown jewels of its intellectual property (the alogorithms on which it’s search product is based) still remain a closely guarded secret.

Which is partly what makes the Wikia Search project so interesting. Led by Wikipedia’s co-founder Jimmy Wales and named after his umbrella company, Wikia Search is developing new search products with one crucial difference – the algorithms which provide the basis for its results will be completely open. Wales, whose whole business and philosophy is based on the power of open-source and human collaboration, is taking on the giants of search and in doing so is challenging some well established web practices. He wants to "collectively work to free the judgment of information from invisible rules inside an algorithmic black box", believing that people will trust the results they are getting far more if they understand how they got them. He has recently released a product under an open source licence and has a disparate bunch of developers working on it, organising themselves around four key principles which they believe the future of Internet search must be based on (as quoted):

1. Transparency – Openness in how the systems and algorithms operate, both in the form of open source licenses and open content + APIs.
2. Community – Everyone is able to contribute in some way (as individuals or entire organizations), strong social and community focus.
3. Quality – Significantly improve the relevancy and accuracy of search results and the searching experience.
4. Privacy – Must be protected, do not store or transmit any identifying data.

One of their active areas of focus is social search methodologies – "sources for URL reputation, experiments in wiki-style social ranking."

The whole concept of search protocols being built using open source principles whilst combining algorithmic and human resource is fascinating. Will it ever threaten Google? I don’t know. But it is another sign that some of the fundamental principles on which business is founded are changing. The collaborative conventions that provide impetus behind open source have already gained serious cultural traction (Blogging, Creative Commons et al). Mass collaboration is a hugely powerful tool. Does not the new world order mean that all companies have to accept a far more open approach in their business in order not only to succeed, but to survive?

8 responses to “The Future of Search?”

  1. daniel rueda Avatar
    daniel rueda

    wiki search
    wika search
    wikia
    wiki
    wikipedia
    wikia search
    wikiasaurus
    you would think if the guy knew so much he would at least choose a good url. when what ever he does gets some traction if any, other engines will implement the same system on there platform in about 5 minutes. for him to believe he is some open source pioneer may be true but to believe he will compete with google with some corn on the cob lost in cyberblah url is impossible. consumers are at a apex of urlblah and contentblah overload.

  2. daniel rueda Avatar
    daniel rueda

    wiki search
    wika search
    wikia
    wiki
    wikipedia
    wikia search
    wikiasaurus
    you would think if the guy knew so much he would at least choose a good url. when what ever he does gets some traction if any, other engines will implement the same system on there platform in about 5 minutes. for him to believe he is some open source pioneer may be true but to believe he will compete with google with some corn on the cob lost in cyberblah url is impossible. consumers are at a apex of urlblah and contentblah overload.

  3. erin Avatar
    erin

    i would like to think that an open approach to business could be realized, accepted and moved forward with in importance BUT I am learning that the business side of messaging/advertising/marketing is still a huge dinosaur stomping on our nymph-like, imaginative, creative, social ways of seeing the world.
    But keep dreaming, i think it’s a better world to play in. It’s bridging the two that planners can ultimately affect the most. ya? Me thinks so.
    Maybe it’d be a nice homework assignment to find a business out there that’s doing the collaboration thing and succeeding. It’s an interesting point your post made me think about: The creative, collaborative peeps trying to work with these “I am the best, the one, the only” companies. Again, planners need to rally the cry to bring them back down to earth where real people live and like to interact with other real people. Brands that can play in this world are more likely to be successful in the long-run, no?
    Ok. Done. 🙂

  4. erin Avatar
    erin

    i would like to think that an open approach to business could be realized, accepted and moved forward with in importance BUT I am learning that the business side of messaging/advertising/marketing is still a huge dinosaur stomping on our nymph-like, imaginative, creative, social ways of seeing the world.
    But keep dreaming, i think it’s a better world to play in. It’s bridging the two that planners can ultimately affect the most. ya? Me thinks so.
    Maybe it’d be a nice homework assignment to find a business out there that’s doing the collaboration thing and succeeding. It’s an interesting point your post made me think about: The creative, collaborative peeps trying to work with these “I am the best, the one, the only” companies. Again, planners need to rally the cry to bring them back down to earth where real people live and like to interact with other real people. Brands that can play in this world are more likely to be successful in the long-run, no?
    Ok. Done. 🙂

  5. neilperkin Avatar
    neilperkin

    Thanks for the comments guys. I’ve no doubt that a successful model would quickly be adopted/adapted by the big players but could they do it as effectively or be recognised as such by users? It’s a big question.
    Erin – nicely put.

  6. neilperkin Avatar
    neilperkin

    Thanks for the comments guys. I’ve no doubt that a successful model would quickly be adopted/adapted by the big players but could they do it as effectively or be recognised as such by users? It’s a big question.
    Erin – nicely put.

  7. lolly Avatar
    lolly

    Neil,
    Thanks for the info – I have discovered so many new search engines since I started blogging and my favourite one is…. GOOGLE!
    The concept sounds interesting however I don’t think it’ll be enough to jeopardise google.
    Saying that I do believe that search engine will have to evolve to filter the increasing amount of info on the www.

  8. lolly Avatar
    lolly

    Neil,
    Thanks for the info – I have discovered so many new search engines since I started blogging and my favourite one is…. GOOGLE!
    The concept sounds interesting however I don’t think it’ll be enough to jeopardise google.
    Saying that I do believe that search engine will have to evolve to filter the increasing amount of info on the www.

Leave a Reply