Posted on 

 by 

 in 

Blended Measurement

Online is sometimes a victim of it's own accountability. It can be hard to navigate in a blizzard of metrics, and putting measures against social media is even tougher. In the old world, our measures were constant, controlled, fixed, familiar, steady. Social media is fluid, moving, changeable, unexpected. Campaigns used to be nicely packaged entities. They had a beginning, middle and an end. Good social media campaigns increase their value over time and are far from short-term. But in the current environment of test-and-learn, measuring is the only way we know what works.

So what's the answer? One things for sure, click rate in isolation isn't it. Trying to enforce old media methods, or even basic new media metrics will not tell you anything that's worth knowing. Measuring the effectiveness of social media campaigns is going to involve a whole new cocktail combining hard and fast metrics like visitors, click-throughs, time spent, interactions, pass-alongs, embeds, games played, videos watched, groups joined, with judicious use of bespoke metrics, qual measures, and the whole host of new (and free) metrics which are out there. The smart will understand that the more custom the blend, the greater the knowledge.

6 responses to “Blended Measurement”

  1. Rob @ Cynic Avatar
    Rob @ Cynic

    Good points Neil – however in the case of Digital, I have this weird feeling that accountability isn’t what is stopping certain companies from investing in the medium – infact I think it’s because it is so accountable [compared to many other media] that is causing certain organisations not to “buy” because underneath it all, they don’t want to know just how much wastage is going on with their advertising.
    I know I’m not explaining what I’m trying to say well, but I’m working with a bunch of researchers to try find out if there is substance to the hypothesis and when I finally don’t sound a nutter, I’ll get back to you. 🙂

  2. Rob @ Cynic Avatar
    Rob @ Cynic

    Good points Neil – however in the case of Digital, I have this weird feeling that accountability isn’t what is stopping certain companies from investing in the medium – infact I think it’s because it is so accountable [compared to many other media] that is causing certain organisations not to “buy” because underneath it all, they don’t want to know just how much wastage is going on with their advertising.
    I know I’m not explaining what I’m trying to say well, but I’m working with a bunch of researchers to try find out if there is substance to the hypothesis and when I finally don’t sound a nutter, I’ll get back to you. 🙂

  3. Rob @ Cynic Avatar
    Rob @ Cynic

    Of course you’re basically saying the same bloody thing and if I read the first sentence of your post more closely, I’d of not wasted your time writing such a confusing bunch of unmitigated bollocks.
    Sorry.

  4. Rob @ Cynic Avatar
    Rob @ Cynic

    Of course you’re basically saying the same bloody thing and if I read the first sentence of your post more closely, I’d of not wasted your time writing such a confusing bunch of unmitigated bollocks.
    Sorry.

  5. neilperkin Avatar
    neilperkin

    No no Rob – I think you’re making a good (albeit similar) point. Would be interested the know the results of that study when you get ’em.

  6. neilperkin Avatar
    neilperkin

    No no Rob – I think you’re making a good (albeit similar) point. Would be interested the know the results of that study when you get ’em.

Leave a Reply