Posted on 

 by 

 in 

When Is A Tribute Not A Tribute?

Regular readers of this blog will already know my views on campaigns which reproduce creative concepts from elsewhere without at least enhancing or building on the idea in some way. Creative Review have just posted about the new Fiat Grande Punto ad which unashamedly uses Roel Wouters’ brilliant Grip music video for zZz:

And here’s the ad:

Thing is, it seems that the agency contacted Wouters’ production company and voluntarily paid a license fee to use the idea (when in theory they didn’t have to). So does that make it OK? The ad is so similar to the original film that it is almost a copy. Wouters himself is quoted by CR as saying that although the degree of similarity is a little wierd, "it gives the feeling of a sincere tribute". But then he’s also quoted as saying that the treatment of the idea is not as strong, and that "the content seems to be disconnected from the form".

I’m really not sure. I applaud the fact that Wouters was paid a fee, and he will likely benefit from wider exposure of his idea, but this still leaves me feeling uncomfortable. It’s just so similar, and there’s little attempt at interpreting or building on the original idea here and so the creative input is limited. And most people who are exposed to this ad will likely not be familiar with the original film, so can it have real value as a tribute?

6 responses to “When Is A Tribute Not A Tribute?”

  1. eaon Avatar
    eaon

    five words: annie lennox train in vain.
    seriously though i’m not sure whats worse – the straight up copy or wacky ‘interpretation’

  2. eaon Avatar
    eaon

    five words: annie lennox train in vain.
    seriously though i’m not sure whats worse – the straight up copy or wacky ‘interpretation’

  3. andrea Avatar
    andrea

    It’s always tricky when you know an ‘internet thing’ that could go SO well with what you’re doing, naturally if you spend 12 hours a day browsing the internet you forget the fact that the ‘rest of the world’ hasn’t seen any of it.
    The great public will never know if it’s a copy, a tribute or whatever unless they really feel like doing a bit of digging. So the way I see things, it’s noteworthy that the agency paid a fee to use the idea – anyone doing research into that will surely appreciate the gesture.
    What do you make of the Russian gmail ads? Not sure you can link videos here in comments but surely there are plenty on youtube.

  4. andrea Avatar
    andrea

    It’s always tricky when you know an ‘internet thing’ that could go SO well with what you’re doing, naturally if you spend 12 hours a day browsing the internet you forget the fact that the ‘rest of the world’ hasn’t seen any of it.
    The great public will never know if it’s a copy, a tribute or whatever unless they really feel like doing a bit of digging. So the way I see things, it’s noteworthy that the agency paid a fee to use the idea – anyone doing research into that will surely appreciate the gesture.
    What do you make of the Russian gmail ads? Not sure you can link videos here in comments but surely there are plenty on youtube.

  5. Charles Frith Avatar
    Charles Frith

    I’m comfortable with ripping ideas off and this instance I can’t really see how the idea could be taken further. Unless I took off my planning hat and put my creative one on 😉

  6. Charles Frith Avatar
    Charles Frith

    I’m comfortable with ripping ideas off and this instance I can’t really see how the idea could be taken further. Unless I took off my planning hat and put my creative one on 😉

Leave a Reply