Posted on 

 by 

 in 

Modelling Social Networks

David has a particularly excellent blog and writes well, notably about social media, communities and the power of the network. He has produced a snappy 10 slides which I’ve posted below on "Why Traditional Ad Models Won’t Work In Social Networks (and what will)". They make some good points that echo some of the things I’ve talked about here (I particularly like: "They aren’t looking at the stage, they’re looking at each other").

I said in my extended rant below on the requirement for business-model innovation about the parallel need for a change in mindset. From limited to free-thinking. From models based on scarcity to those framed by abundance. It feels to me like this is central to the thorny issue of how to generate commercial and advertising models within social networks that are valued and valuable. Perhaps the reason that they have struggled thus far is something to do with Shirky’s observation that "when the technology gets boring, the social effects become interesting". Maybe we are yet to see the really seismic effects of everyone being connected. Maybe it needs to get to the point where the ad models require the technology but are not about the technology. Which then can properly mean that your marketing is no longer dependent on a scarce resource (your advertising budget), but on an abundant resource (your customers).

We have moved into the knowledge economy. So perhaps future models will focus on abundant resources (like knowledge), rather than scarce ones (like time and attention). If you can present me with the knowledge I need when I need it then I’ll happily receive it. In fact I might even pay for it. Perhaps it is about redefining what media is and does. And redefining an opportunity. As Umair Haque of the Havas Media Lab said recently:

“In an interconnected world, media is everywhere: it’s the stuff that plugs consumption and production together. The opportunities for value creation are greater than ever before – but we must expand our vision of what media is to begin realizing them”

8 responses to “Modelling Social Networks”

  1. Gavin Heaton Avatar
    Gavin Heaton

    Great way of framing the debate, Neil! If we take this starting point “marketing is no longer dependent on a scarce resource (your advertising budget), but on an abundant resource (your customers)” — then perhaps we are not just talking about a change in the nature of marketing, but also a change in the nature of relationships. And I think this can only be a good thing!

  2. Gavin Heaton Avatar
    Gavin Heaton

    Great way of framing the debate, Neil! If we take this starting point “marketing is no longer dependent on a scarce resource (your advertising budget), but on an abundant resource (your customers)” — then perhaps we are not just talking about a change in the nature of marketing, but also a change in the nature of relationships. And I think this can only be a good thing!

  3. david cushman Avatar
    david cushman

    Thank you so much for the kind words and link love.
    You’re bang on the money (at least I think so!) in sharing Shirky’s observation. I honestly believe the great disruption of the internet (and for me, the internet is a network in which we can better form groups or purpose) has only just begun.
    Technology only changes the world when it has a user-friendly interface and is ubiquitous. For me, social networks are our user-friendly interface for group forming. When our use of them becomes truly ubiquitous, then the depth of the disruption will be revealed.
    I spoke on that in NYC and London last month with this presentation:
    http://fasterfuture.blogspot.com/2008/06/were-all-publishers-now-my-presentation.html
    perhaps just read from slide 28 if time is short 😉
    Once again, very many thanks Neil.

  4. david cushman Avatar
    david cushman

    Thank you so much for the kind words and link love.
    You’re bang on the money (at least I think so!) in sharing Shirky’s observation. I honestly believe the great disruption of the internet (and for me, the internet is a network in which we can better form groups or purpose) has only just begun.
    Technology only changes the world when it has a user-friendly interface and is ubiquitous. For me, social networks are our user-friendly interface for group forming. When our use of them becomes truly ubiquitous, then the depth of the disruption will be revealed.
    I spoke on that in NYC and London last month with this presentation:
    http://fasterfuture.blogspot.com/2008/06/were-all-publishers-now-my-presentation.html
    perhaps just read from slide 28 if time is short 😉
    Once again, very many thanks Neil.

  5. Jeremy Greenfield Avatar
    Jeremy Greenfield

    When brands can figure out how to turn themselves into characters with stories and personalities, they will be able to figure out how to participate in the same sort of social interchange that has come to dominate the internet. In the advertising age, it would have been sufficient to find a way to exploit social networking technology to get one’s message in front of an audience. Brands still try it anyway, and not one with any success whatsoever yet. In the post-advertising age, this kind of interruption and persuasion is not appreciated.
    Once brands understand this, it will be easier for them, given the tools now available, to leverage new technologies to reach their audiences. It’s the social networks and applications that are up against it in figuring out how to monetize their power.

  6. Jeremy Greenfield Avatar
    Jeremy Greenfield

    When brands can figure out how to turn themselves into characters with stories and personalities, they will be able to figure out how to participate in the same sort of social interchange that has come to dominate the internet. In the advertising age, it would have been sufficient to find a way to exploit social networking technology to get one’s message in front of an audience. Brands still try it anyway, and not one with any success whatsoever yet. In the post-advertising age, this kind of interruption and persuasion is not appreciated.
    Once brands understand this, it will be easier for them, given the tools now available, to leverage new technologies to reach their audiences. It’s the social networks and applications that are up against it in figuring out how to monetize their power.

  7. neilperkin Avatar
    neilperkin

    Gavin, David, Jeremy – thanks. I wonder if the networks have missed a trick in letting all the potential benefit from applications go to the developers of those applications? If you create a widget for example, which then carries content which someone is paying you to distribute, and it was being distributed using your network and platform, wouldn’t you want a slice of that?

  8. neilperkin Avatar
    neilperkin

    Gavin, David, Jeremy – thanks. I wonder if the networks have missed a trick in letting all the potential benefit from applications go to the developers of those applications? If you create a widget for example, which then carries content which someone is paying you to distribute, and it was being distributed using your network and platform, wouldn’t you want a slice of that?

Leave a Reply