Posted on 

 by 

 in ,

The Nobel Internet

I'm in two minds about this. The Italian edition of Wired has launched a campaign to get the next Nobel Peace Prize awarded to the internet. The Editor says that the internet is the first "weapon of mass construction, which we can deploy to destroy hate and to propagate peace and democracy", and his cause is supported by the other global editions of Wired, and some big name ambassadors. According to Wired UK, 23 of the 120 previous laureates have been organisations (including, when I looked at the list, Amnesty International, Unicef, Medecins Sans Frontieres and the International Atomic Energy Agency). But to me this has somewhat of a publicity-seeking, gestural feel about it. Like when Time Magazine chose their person of the year as 'You' back in 2006. And the internet is a reflection of many things, good and bad, productive and destructive, peaceful and violent.

Then again. Then again, it is a recognition of what the internet is – not a collection of computers, pipes and relays but people connected. And a recognition of the potential that that holds. And it reminds you that technological growth will likely define our future, we are all digital architects, and so the responsibility to fulfill that potential belongs to all of us. As the campaign manifesto says:

"Digital culture has laid the foundations for a new kind of society. And this society is advancing dialogue, debate and consensus through communication. Because democracy has always flourished where there is openness, acceptance, discussion and participation. And contact with others has always been the most
effective antidote against hatred and conflict."

Listening to some of the comments from the likes of Sir Tim Berners-Lee, Al Gore, Bill Gates and Stephen Fry in the preview below (HT) of The Virtual Revolution (a forthcoming documentary from the BBC) you can't help but agree that it is the defining technological revolution of our lifetimes. But does that mean it should win the Nobel prize? After writing that, I guess on balance I think perhaps it should. What do you think?

12 responses to “The Nobel Internet”

  1. Howard Weaver Avatar
    Howard Weaver

    I think Al-Qaeda, the Craigslist pedophiles, the Aryan Nations and all the related hate and terror organizations would love this.
    As Shirky et al keep reminding us, the internet isn’t one thing. Certainly not one global peaceful thing.

  2. Howard Weaver Avatar
    Howard Weaver

    I think Al-Qaeda, the Craigslist pedophiles, the Aryan Nations and all the related hate and terror organizations would love this.
    As Shirky et al keep reminding us, the internet isn’t one thing. Certainly not one global peaceful thing.

  3. neilperkin Avatar
    neilperkin

    I take your point Howard – as I said in the post the internet is many things, good and bad. But isn’t it better to celebrate the good than dwell on the bad?

  4. neilperkin Avatar
    neilperkin

    I take your point Howard – as I said in the post the internet is many things, good and bad. But isn’t it better to celebrate the good than dwell on the bad?

  5. Tim Harrap Avatar
    Tim Harrap

    It is interesting that it is the Italian’s who are promoting this idea. For me at the moment the book Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire by Michael Hardt and (the Italian) Antonio Negri is a great source of understanding (for me at least!) as to the changed environment in which we are living. They proffer a rich historical overview and tease out the clash between the the concept of “the people” and “the multitude” and helps sum up the difficulties we face in trying to use construct comprehension of the times we live in and efforts for a completion of the democratic process. Peace Prize for the Internet? Well suppose so, it is a “gong” for everyone and continues to flag up how dynamic the changes are that we are facing.

  6. Tim Harrap Avatar
    Tim Harrap

    It is interesting that it is the Italian’s who are promoting this idea. For me at the moment the book Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire by Michael Hardt and (the Italian) Antonio Negri is a great source of understanding (for me at least!) as to the changed environment in which we are living. They proffer a rich historical overview and tease out the clash between the the concept of “the people” and “the multitude” and helps sum up the difficulties we face in trying to use construct comprehension of the times we live in and efforts for a completion of the democratic process. Peace Prize for the Internet? Well suppose so, it is a “gong” for everyone and continues to flag up how dynamic the changes are that we are facing.

  7. neilperkin Avatar
    neilperkin

    Thanks Tim – interested in the perspective you’re getting from the Hardt and Negri book – are you going to write anything about it?

  8. neilperkin Avatar
    neilperkin

    Thanks Tim – interested in the perspective you’re getting from the Hardt and Negri book – are you going to write anything about it?

  9. tim Avatar
    tim

    Write about the Hardt & Negri book? Well that would be very nice Neil I would love to do that but a full time job interposes a lot. I like the challenge. To have some Marxists conclude that what is need is love is quite something and worth reinterpreting in brief for a wider audience.

  10. tim Avatar
    tim

    Write about the Hardt & Negri book? Well that would be very nice Neil I would love to do that but a full time job interposes a lot. I like the challenge. To have some Marxists conclude that what is need is love is quite something and worth reinterpreting in brief for a wider audience.

  11. Sean Howard Avatar
    Sean Howard

    Who should accept the award?
    The original architects of DDN and Milnet/Arpanet? That would sort of be ironic, no? 😉

  12. Sean Howard Avatar
    Sean Howard

    Who should accept the award?
    The original architects of DDN and Milnet/Arpanet? That would sort of be ironic, no? 😉

Leave a Reply