'The battle between every startup and incumbent comes down to whether the startup gets distribution before the incumbent gets innovation.'
Saying that large, legacy businesses should act like startups is overly simplistic and lazy thinking. There is much that big companies can and need to do to step change innovation and agility (and I've written a couple of books on just that topic of-course) but incumbent businesses are not startups and nor can they ever be. Which is why I've always liked the Andreesen Horowitz quote above (taken from this post).
In Ernest Hemingway’s 1926 novel ‘The Sun Also Rises’ the character Mike Campbell is asked about his money troubles:
“How did you go bankrupt?” Bill asked
“Two ways,” Mike said. “Gradually and then suddenly.”
This is how disruption also happens, Slowly, then very quickly. In the early stages the initial signs go unnoticed or are ignored through complacency or arrogance. In the latter stages the incumbent business lacks the responsiveness, ability or imagination to react in the required way.
So big business needs to get way better at integrating the kind of agility and continuous innovation that can enable it to survive and thrive in an era of heightened unpredictability. But big business also has many advantages at its disposal, not least the scale, distribution, and leverage that it has acquired over years of practice and growth. So the real battle is about who can learn and acquire capabilities quicker. Can the startup can acquire scaled distribution before the incumbent understands how it can unlearn what it needs to reimagine and relearn new ways of working that can transform its approach to innovation and speed to market.
It's a much more useful way of understanding the real dynamics involved in disruption and transformation.
Leave a Reply